News

The brief, filed in support of the temporary injunction plaintiffs believe is necessary to keep them from irreparable harm, argues that the State’s “large-capacity” magazine ban laws not only violate Second Amendment rights, but also violate the Constitution’s guarantee of due process, prohibition against government taking of private property without just compensation, and are unconstitutionally vague.

Combs said some dealers, concerned they could lose their license or face criminal charges if they unwittingly facilitate an illegal sale, have resorted to obtaining signed declarations promising no laws are being broken from anyone who wants to transfer an off-roster gun.

The plaintiffs believe that the State’s ban violates their constitutional rights, including their fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms protected under the Second Amendment, because magazines are “an intrinsic part of all semi-automatic firearms” and “are not merely individual pieces of personal property, but rather, are intrinsic and inherent constitutionally-protected parts of constitutionally-protected firearms.”

By refusing to correct the panel’s decision here, the Ninth Circuit has dared the Supreme Court to overturn them or bind tens of millions of law-abiding people to the tyrannies imposed on them and their right to keep and bear arms by the State of California and other similarly-hostile governments.

This is a CRITICAL case. If the government can ban gun stores, then it also has the power to choke off gun owners and limit your exercise of Second Amendment rights.

We filed this lawsuit to fight DOJ’s tyrannical ‘rulemaking-by-executive-fiat’ and protect law-abiding gun owners from criminal liability for just following the text of the Penal Code.

Today, attorneys for The Calguns Foundation (CGF), Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), and two individual plaintiffs filed a petition with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals seeking en banc (full court) review of a wrongly-decided opinion that overturned the trial court’s judgment that California’s Waiting Period Laws violate the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.

While the data continues to prove out that the Roster is really just a dressed-up handgun ban, it isn’t a new conclusion…

Alameda County’s zoning ordinance regarding gun stores to get its day in court.

(San Francisco) – Three Second Amendment civil rights groups are hailing a new Second Amendment decision issued by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals today.

Earlier today, the California Department of Justice released proposed “emergency” regulations on the new total possessory ban on “large-capacity” magazines under SB 1446 (2016) and