You can be a part of history!
We currently have two VERY important cases navigating their way through the court system.
Silvester v. Kamala Harris is a Second Amendment challenge to California’s 10-day waiting period. (The District Court previously ruled in our favor following a three-day bench trial.)
And Tracy Rifle and Pistol v. Kamala Harris challenges California’s ban on some truthful, non misleading handgun-related speech by firearm dealers — what we believe is a violation of First Amendment rights.
Both lawsuits seek to strike down paternalistic gun control laws that infringe upon your constitutional rights.
But both important lawsuits have something else in common…
The laws in question in both Silvester and Tracy Rifle are byproducts of the same gun control bill that was passed in 1923!
We’re working to restore your firearms freedoms not only by attacking unconstitutional laws themselves, but by dismantling the very foundations of California’s gun control scheme.
But we can’t do it without your support.
If you’d like to see California and Kamala Harris lose, please chip in a tax-deductible donation to support these and other gun rights cases.
Thank you for your continuing support of Silvester v. Harris and Tracy Rifle v. Harris.
Without you, none of it would be possible.
[gravityform id=”21″ title=”false” description=”false” ajax=”true”]
CGF, FPC and FPCAF File Brief in Support of Challenge to Hawaii Public Handgun Carry Bans
“The locations Hawaii now hopes to treat as ‘sensitive’ cannot possibly be analogized to the core founding-era sensitive locations recognized in Bruen and District of Columbia v. Heller,” argues the brief. “The historical record shows that, at the founding, carry restrictions were strictly limited to locations where the government provided comprehensive security, which stands in stark contrast to Hawaii’s sweeping restrictions.”
