Sometimes it feels like the gun grabbers always get their way, and gun control has become a total pay-for-play scheme.
And when gun control advocates get their way, there is only one practical and effective way to fight back and restore the Second Amendment rights they legislate away from us: with strong, pro-gun lawsuits in the court system.
The Calguns Foundation is the most feared and respected Second Amendment legal action group on the West Coast – and we have big plans.
But before we launch new lawsuits, we need to hold on to some major pro-gun CGF victories like Silvester v. Harris and Teixeira v. County of Alameda, both currently at the Ninth Circuit (and potentially making their way to the U.S. Supreme Court).
In order to make sure that we can fund the important and expensive legal work necessary to secure your gun rights in these critical cases – maybe the two most important cases currently at the appellate level – we’ve set a goal to raise $50,000 in the month of September.
We believe that we can do just that — but only if we can count on your support right now.
And we’re also going to upset some gun-grabbers today with a giveaway for a brand new, insanely awesome SureFire XC1 WeaponLight….mounted on a brand new Glock 19!
There’s absolutely no purchase or donation required to enter our Glock 19 giveaway, but we hope that we can count on you to help us meet or beat our $50,000 goal so we can keep fighting hard for your Second Amendment gun rights.
Please consider chipping in $50, $25, or whatever you can afford to help us save our pro-gun wins and restore the Second Amendment to its rightful place as a fundamental, individual right.
[gravityform id=”23″ title=”false” description=”false” ajax=”true”]
View the rules here.
CGF, FPC and FPCAF File Brief in Support of Challenge to Hawaii Public Handgun Carry Bans
“The locations Hawaii now hopes to treat as ‘sensitive’ cannot possibly be analogized to the core founding-era sensitive locations recognized in Bruen and District of Columbia v. Heller,” argues the brief. “The historical record shows that, at the founding, carry restrictions were strictly limited to locations where the government provided comprehensive security, which stands in stark contrast to Hawaii’s sweeping restrictions.”
